Conference Abstract

Rapid Surveillance Study to Evaluate the Safety of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine (Abrysvo™) Exposure During Pregnancy in the United States

May 26, 2025
Authors:

MacDonald SC, Gandhi S, Adimadhyam S, Albert S, Anastasiou O, Andrade SE, Back S, Cosgrove A, Djibo DA, Koram N, Kuntz JL, Lino M, Love S, McElroy NP, McMahillWalraven CN, Michnick AI, Palmsten K, Petrone A, Platt R, Round KE, Rubino H, Wentz A, Zhang F, Maro JC

Capability:
Pregnancy & Mother-Infant Linked Studies
Multi-Site Methods & Coordination
Expertise:
Regulatory Research & Support
RWE Research & Consulting

Presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of European Society for Pediatric Infectious Diseases (ESPID)

Background: ABRYSVO™ is a maternal vaccine to prevent infant RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness. A rapid cycle analysis (RCA) is ongoing to conduct early detection of safety signals (EUPAS1000000115). Cumulative data through the second of five planned hypothesis tests are presented.

Objective: To rapidly monitor incidence proportions of 10 prespecified safety outcomes following ABRYSVO and comparator maternal vaccination using US administrative claims data.

Methods: Pregnancies vaccinated at 32-36 weeks' gestation with ABRYSVO (exposure) or influenza/Tdap/COVID-19 (comparator) were identified from September 2018-January 2023 (historical comparator) and September 2023-February 2024 (exposure, concurrent comparator). Outcome incidence was assessed using maximized Sequential Probability Ratio Tests, and included preterm birth, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [HDP], stillbirth, premature labor without preterm delivery, premature rupture of membranes [PROM], preterm PROM; Guillain-Barré syndrome, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, and low birth weight. Potential confounding variables were maternal age, season, gestational age at vaccination, and evidence of high-risk for prematurity.

Results: Historical Comparison: 5,027 ABRYSVO-exposed and 143,459 comparator pregnancies were observed. Only PROM (crude incidence proportion [IP] 13.4% [95% CI: 12.4-14.3%] vs. 12.5% [12.4-12.7%]) and HDP (without secular trend adjustment) (crude IP 17.4% [16.4-18.5%] vs. 13.4% [13.2-13.6%]) met the criteria to reject the null hypothesis of no excess risk.

Concurrent Comparison: 5,028 ABRYSVO-exposed and 6,528 concurrent comparator pregnancies were observed. Only HDP (17.4% [16.4-18.5%] vs. 15.7% [14.8-16.6%]) met the criteria to reject the null hypothesis of no excess risk.

Monitoring is ongoing for all remaining outcomes that have not reached statistical stopping points.

Conclusions: Further investigation is needed to explore a potential increased risk of PROM and HDP following ABRYSVO exposure. RCAs, while allowing for rapid safety monitoring, have limited confounding control and therefore cannot demonstrate causality.

View the poster